The Oxford University Society
To all Branch Secretaries and Presidents
July, 2004
Dear Secretary,
Dear President,
It is important that I write to you with news of the resolution
which was passed nem con at the AGM of the Society on
10 July, as many of you were not able to get to Oxford for the
meeting. The text of the resolution, together with the explanation
for it from Council and the Trustees, is as below.
The Board of Trustees, together with the Council of the Oxford
University Society, propose the changing of the constitutional
basis of the Society in order to enable its activities to continue
within the aegis of the University of Oxford itself. The organisation
will continue to operate under the name of The Oxford University
Society, and the assets of the Society will continue to be used
for the promotion of the purposes of the former charitable company.
Their expenditure will be supervised by a Board constituted in
accordance with the Regulations and Standing Orders attached.
This AGM therefore resolves that the Society as at present constituted
under the Memorandum and Articles of Association adopted at the
AGM of 2000, should be wound up and merged into the exempt charity
of the University of Oxford as of 31 December, 2004.
As from 1 January, 2005 the Society will be a Department of the
University. Regulations and Standing Orders as attached will come
into effect on that date, subject to the agreement of the Council
of the University.
Lady Goodhart urged the AGM to accept this resolution. The Chairman
said that it was time to begin a further stage in the development
of the mutual support between University and Society. Although
the Society was to become a department of the University, the
Trustees had been at pains to ensure the retention of the Society’s
independent identity. She was confident that the negotiated arrangements
would maintain this independence. But she believed that funding
needed to be increased in order for the delivery of the sort of
alumni activity the University should have. This increase she
felt was far more likely under the aegis of the University.
The discussion from the floor was constructive and favourable
to the resolution.
As some of you have been targeted by the anti-vivisectionists,
protesting at the building of the new University facility in South
Parks Road, it is also important that I give you a digest of what
the Vice Chancellor said in his remarks to the AGM.
As members knew, the University’s new biomedical research
support building had attracted the attention of the anti-vivisectionists.
The building is part of an ongoing programme of replacing and
updating existing University laboratory space and will result
in the closure of a number of existing animal facilities. The
building was neither a successor to Huntingdon Life Sciences nor
a replacement for the proposed primate facilities in Cambridge.
This new £18m facility would be one of the best in the country,
and 98% of the animals housed there would be rodents. The Vice
Chancellor went on to confirm that the University’s research
with animals was governed by four key principles: First, all projects
are subject to strict ethical approval, which involves lay and
external scrutiny. Secondly, all projects are subject to the Home
Office animal research licensing regime. Thirdly, all projects
are carried out in the best available conditions of animal welfare
and housing. Fourthly, Oxford intends to remain a leader in the
field of research to find substitutes for the use of animals in
research when at all possible. While he affirmed his belief in
the sanctity of freedom of expression, he could not agree with
terrorism and personal attacks.
Now that the decision to merge the Society with the University
has been taken, there will be a period of transition, with the
charitable company being wound up and the Society becoming part
of the University. None of us expects that there will be any problems
with the transition. I sense in the branches an energy and willingness
to move things forward, to be getting on with the exciting task
of cooperation between alumni and University to the betterment
of both. Certainly we feel that way here in the office.
The office has acquired two new members of staff. Cathy Tennent
has arrived to be Alumni Liaison Officer from her former position
as a travel rep, with the major tasks of running our travel programme
and being the point person for the Email Forwarding Service. She
has made a breathtakingly rapid start at putting together the
new set of tours and this year’s brochure. I think you will
be very impressed when you see them. The brochure will come out
in October. Claire Larkin is our new Administration and Finance
Officer. She is the person whose voice you will hear on the phone
when you ring the office, and it is notable that, when we were
first contacting her former University department, Economics,
we were impressed by the voice on that phone, which turned out
to be Claire’s. She also carries responsibility for two
baffling elements of the work here, our relation with the University’s
OSIRIS accounting system, and being my PA, which includes setting
up and maintaining a database of speakers for branches.
Could I remind you all that I asked for suggestions for the way
forward for the Society, once it joins the University? Some of
you have sent helpful messages, but planning hasn’t really
begun, so there is plenty of time for others to let me have their
thoughts. We are grateful for the more formal help being given
by the Secretary of the Southern California Branch, Dan Guhr,
and by John Mihaly, who is responsible for organizing off-campus
events for Vassar alumni, on sabbatical at St Peter’s College.
The international spread of the Society continues to delight
me. We had an email message earlier this week from a student leaving
Mansfield to return to Baku. So the Society now has a “man
in Baku”.
This brings greetings from us all. Please do let us have your
suggestions for how we can improve what we do for you at this
end. We are certainly very grateful for all you do for the Society
and for Oxford.
Yours sincerely,
Nancy Kenny